CrowdStrike showed us the risks of over-automation. Will we heed the warning?

By S.A. Applin, Fast Company 

Last month’s CrowdStrike incident was preventable. Even though the company claims to have testing protocols, it still managed to release buggy software in an automated update that caused tremendous damage and inconvenience to thousands of people. There are many factors that contributed to this mistake, and some of them have to do with people, assumptions, and misapplied startup culture.

The computerized systems that run most of the world we depend on (shipping, rail and air freight, flights, hospitals, banks, governments, and emergency services, etc.) all have operating systems with specific configurations, and many of these machine configurations are not standardized to each other. Because they are heterogeneous, they do not run, fail, or stay intact in standardized ways. There are different vendors for different needs, machines, industries, and preferences. And within those contexts, even when the same software is used, there are different versions of the same software. A lot of that software relies on automated updates. With the Crowdsource fiasco, we saw what happens if one of those automated updates go wrong.

More here >

This post was originally published on this site

Marketing block

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Recent Posts

Sign Up for Updates

Get the latest stock market news from Phil by signing up for our newsletter!


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact